Wednesday, March 23, 2016

More rough drafts!

So first off, good news! I forgot mention, I got my dance costumes last week meaning I will not be going on stage in spandex and a sports bra! I'm just kidding... kind of. The fact that I have my dance costumes does mean I will not be dancing in spandex and a sports bra, but the reason you all should care is because I have a costume for my model to wear for my cover (Christa may be bringing her own but there are more options, especially if I need more models for TOC pictures.)

Next thing I want to talk about is I have been touring colleges this week (Go Commodores and Bulldogs!) so I have yet to have the chance to gather pictures or truly begin working on my layout, so what I decided to do was make a rough draft of my two page spread article. I decided to go with the Too Risqué? article about if dance is affecting the development and growth of young girls particularity in the 10-14 year old age range. This article I feel like is original, and informative, and really has an impact on dancers and their parents. I took pictures of the article, but if the pictures are unclear I will reproduce the article above it. This is my first draft, the article has gone through minimal editing and will probably be shortened prior to the final copy.




















Too Risqué?

Is the oversexualizing of young girls in dance affecting their development?

By: Taylor Barton

What do the songs “My Humps”, “Lady Marmalade”, “Hey Big Spender” have in common? They are all popular recital dance recital songs and not just for teenagers. Girls (and boys) anywhere from the ages of 8 to 18 are dancing to songs like this every year in dance recitals across the country. Now these are all very sexual songs to begin with, then if you add in tight, revealing costumes, as well as more and more inappropriate dance moves (like the world famous “twerk”) and you get oversexualized, provocative tween girls (for the most part).

Dance has been a part of society and culture since the earliest times, used for rituals, celebrations, and ceremonies, it has now shifted into a recreational hobby appealing to many far and wide. Children get into dance as early as the age of two, and some continue to not only major in dance at college, but pursue careers in the dance industry. As the dancers develop in age, physically, and in maturity they can handle dances with more serious, hard, even sexual subject matters. More intense subject matters are becoming more and more popular among choreographers, and not just for teens and twenty-something year old, but kids and tweens are faced with dances well beyond their age at an alarming rate.

The argument could be made that the increase in overly mature content stemmed from the hit television reality show Dance Moms, in which head choreography and owner of the Abby Lee Dance Company, Abby Lee Miller, has been known to choreograph intense dances for young girls, that may be as young as 7 and continue onto the age of 13/14 (the studio has older girls, but the show focuses on girls of these ages). Some of Miller’s more inappropriate dances  include the young girls being featured as topless Vegas showgirls (an episode that caused so much public outrage, that Lifetime had to pull the episode from air shortly after initial air date). Other oversexualized dances include “Electricity” (Season 1 Episode 2), or “Snapshot” (Season 1 Episode 8) in which the pre-teen group all came out in bikinis and swimsuits.

Regardless of whether or not the increase of inappropriate dances in recent years is due to Dance Moms, it is obviously apparent that the shift is occurring. Here we have to stop and think; What effects do these over sexualized dances have on the young girls and their development? According to Freudian psychology, emphasis on Freud’s psychosexual stages, girls of the ages 10-14 are either going to be in the latency or genital stage of sexual development, which if Freudian psychology was still practiced, if something hindered or effected the girl’s development in the latency stage, she would never fully be able to develop sexually. The latency stage focuses on the cognitive and social development of the individual, particularly the repression of sexual feelings. If these girls are being encouraged to be oversexualized, with tight costumes with cutaways and fish nets, as well as “stripper-like” moves, there may never be this latency stage, meaning girls will not truly know how to act in future sexual situations. Now by no means does this mean this will able to all girls, the fact of the matter is that many psychologists do not even acknowledge Freudian psychology as valid or logically anymore, but the possibility is there that girls not only exposed to this kind of dance, but have been participating in it, may be more likely to act in more sexual ways during high school.

Besides the possibility of more sexual actions, there also lays the possibilities of many other harmful effects. (I use the words possibilities because nothing is the same for everyone, so there the arguments being made cannot be applied to all young dancers.) These dances can harm a girl’s self-esteem, self-image, and self-worth. If a girl does not deem herself to be “beautiful” or does not have a super skinny, dancer’s body she may feel inferior and below the other dancers while doing slinky dance moves to sexy songs, forever damaging the way she will view herself. Or on the other end of the spectrum, a dancer that has the so called “look” and competes frequently or does a lot of hip hop and jazz classes (typically the two classes with the skimpiest outfits and most risqué moves), she may develop a dependency on heavy makeup and revealing clothing to feel beautiful or comfortable in her own skin. If this is the case we are teaching these girls it is okay to dress like that (which according to recent feminist movements it is, but according to school dress codes and parental orders it is not.) In terms of the status quo as well, clothing that is tight, short, or shows too much skin is deemed as “slutty”, and quite frankly high school girls are mean and will call a girl harsh names based on looks, thus further lowering her self-esteem that could already possibly be damaged. Plus, in current rape culture a common question for a rape victim is “What were you wearing?” If girls become use to wearing skin tight clothing from dance and continue to do so in everyday life, saying they were wearing a crop top and black mini skirt may get them the response “Well, you were kind of asking for it now weren’t you”. I wish I could say this is a far-fetched scenario, but it is (unfortunately) a common occurrence.

The most astounding thing is that parents encourage this behavior. Parents pay large sums of money for classes, competitions, costumes, recitals, etc. and when they see their five year old dancing to “Single Ladies” or their nine year old shaking his/her butt to “Anaconda”, they are not appalled, but rather they applaud. We are, as a society, encouraging this damaging behavior, solely for the fact that it is “entertainment”. We live in a world where being a teen mom is cool because you can get on TV, and to get attention you have to do something wrong or inappropriate. We are putting children’s development at risk, because we think it is “cute” to see ten year olds doing skanky hip hop moves. If we don’t return to more age appropriate time of dances, we are not just damaging this generation but all future ones to come, and the issues that can arise are no laughing matter. 
 
That's all I have for now. Until next blog!- Taylor Barton
 

 
 


 

No comments:

Post a Comment